OPINION
In Uganda today, the one area that truly needs rationalization is our political structure. With an oversized Parliament, excessive government appointees, and a multi-layered security apparatus, the current system has become increasingly costly and inefficient. As a nation, we must take a hard look at how these structures operate and make necessary changes to streamline governance, protect our economy, and better serve Ugandans.
Firstly, the structure of Parliament has expanded far beyond what is necessary. A smaller, more focused Parliament would not only save resources but would also create a more accountable and effective legislative body. Currently, the size and scope of Parliament often lead to inefficiencies and excessive expenditures that could be better directed toward critical areas, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. By reducing the number of parliamentary seats, we foster a leaner group of representatives who can prioritize the needs of the nation over bureaucratic redundancies.
In addition, the number of government appointees has grown significantly, leading to overlapping roles and excessive spending. There are too many positions filled by individuals whose influence is minimal yet whose presence strains public funds. A reduction in the number of appointees would mean that only the most capable and qualified individuals hold influential roles. This shift toward a more merit-based approach would foster efficiency, ensuring that government bodies are led by individuals who are genuinely committed to serving the people and producing results.
On the security front, Uganda’s governance could benefit from a single, unified security body responsible for national oversight, while other departments focus on specialized areas under its guidance. This approach would improve accountability, reduce overlaps, and allow for better resource allocation. Security should prioritize the safety and stability of all Ugandans, not serve as an instrument for political power. A streamlined security apparatus would allow for clearer, more effective lines of communication, greater accountability, and a more citizen-centered approach to national safety.
The ongoing rationalization of the Uganda Coffee Development Authority (UCDA) is a particularly concerning development. As one of Uganda’s most valuable industries, the coffee sector supports the livelihoods of thousands of Ugandans. The UCDA has been instrumental in regulating and supporting this industry, promoting Ugandan coffee in global markets, and securing income for many rural communities. If UCDA’s mandate is weakened or compromised, it risks opening up the sector to exploitation by those in power, rather than serving the interests of the economy as a whole. Undermining UCDA would not only threaten the stability of the coffee industry but could also impact Uganda’s economic independence.
In essence, rationalization in Uganda should not be about concentrating power or eroding critical sectors but about creating a more efficient, transparent, and accountable governance structure that truly serves the people. For Uganda to thrive, we need systems that support sustainable growth, economic resilience, and equitable opportunities. Without this approach, we risk sacrificing our nation’s progress and independence for the interests of a few. The time for meaningful reform is now; rationalization, done right, is essential for a prosperous and just Uganda.
The Author is Omoit Henry
A Political Activist
